Video streamers have released videos documenting their dissatisfaction with privately run restaurants.
They do not have permission from the shopkeeper.
Based on chain stores, it may be natural to feel dissatisfied with independent stores.
That being said, it is unreasonable to unilaterally make derogatory comments in videos.
It would be safer to refrain from exposing your own ignorance.
Filming and publishing without permission
The video streamers appear to have filmed the video without permission at a restaurant run by the owner alone.
This shows that the video streamer lacks a minimum of courtesy and common sense.
They probably weren’t paid any compensation for filming.
By introducing our shop, we are sure to increase its popularity!
I guess that’s what they think.
Even though no one asked for it.
Time from order to delivery
According to the video, which was filmed and released without permission, it took “40 minutes” from ordering food to serving it.
He seems to have complained about this in a video that was shot and released without permission, calling it “slow.”
It seems that chain stores are probably the norm for these people.
In the case of chain stores, the time from order to delivery is roughly set.
I once heard that at a certain family restaurant, the estimated time from ordering to serving is 8 minutes.
If you compare it with that, I think it’s no wonder that 40 minutes feels slow.
However, they are told in advance that it will take some time.
These people might say the same thing at Unagiya.
They probably don’t know that it takes a certain amount of time from preparing eel to grilling it.
Slow! Don’t make me wait for an hour!
I can almost imagine themself saying something like that.
Criticize the store by name
The video streamers seemed annoyed that the store owner was not rushing to provide food and drinks.
This is despite being told in advance that it will take some time.
By the way, regarding the taste of the food, he said it was “delicious.”
In other words, I get the impression that their words and actions are based solely on their own limited taste and experience, and are based on their moods and emotions.
It’s okay to mention the store’s name and praise it, but it’s not good to mention the store’s name and criticize it harshly.
In some cases, this may lead to charges of forcible obstruction of business.
Apparently the store owner didn’t even know that such a video had been released.
A clear difference from the great writers
Shotaro Ikenami’s essays (Ginza Diary, etc.) also include his impressions of the restaurants he visited that day.
He write down the names of restaurants that were delicious and the names of the people who prepared the food, but He does not write down the names of restaurants that were not delicious.
Many people are happy to be praised, but there are also very few people who don’t feel bad about being criticized.
There is a possibility that the restaurant will be forced to go out of business if it is criticized as “That restaurant’s taste was bad.”
Does it feel normal? or not? It will be a fork in the road.
It is unclear what path the video streamers took after the incident.
It is not hard to imagine that they are forced into a difficult situation.
All the music scores on this site were created by site administrator using Muse Score.
Unauthorized reproduction of sheet music and articles is prohibited.
Image source: photo AC
https://www.photo-ac.com/
To listen to the song, click “Cat Guitar Channel”.
Performance information is Cat Guitar Channel Performance Information Please check.
